Presently, the lambda options are theta, salt, and sigma*. Sometimes the dimension name of the derived wmt (G) match this name (e.g. with sigma0) and sometimes they do not (e.g. with theta, the coordinate name is tos for swmt).
I think we should stick with easier and standard naming conventions, i.e. temperature and salinity; and that the dimension name in G should always match the specified lambda. Any disagreement? Should be an easy change.
Presently, the lambda options are
theta
,salt
, andsigma*
. Sometimes the dimension name of the derived wmt (G
) match this name (e.g. withsigma0
) and sometimes they do not (e.g. withtheta
, the coordinate name istos
for swmt).I think we should stick with easier and standard naming conventions, i.e.
temperature
andsalinity
; and that the dimension name inG
should always match the specified lambda. Any disagreement? Should be an easy change.