NOAA-GSL / VxIngest

Other
2 stars 0 forks source link

fix problem with missing wind component data in any given station #317

Closed randytpierce closed 7 months ago

randytpierce commented 7 months ago

Errors were being logged when a station had missing wind components. The station with missing wind components should be gracefully ignored.

github-actions[bot] commented 7 months ago

Code Coverage

Package Line Rate Branch Rate Health
vxingest 33% 42%
vxingest.builder_common 29% 17%
vxingest.ctc_to_cb 12% 1%
vxingest.grib2_to_cb 12% 1%
vxingest.netcdf_to_cb 13% 1%
vxingest.partial_sums_to_cb 12% 1%
vxingest.utilities 30% 32%
Summary 16% (488 / 3017) 6% (40 / 700)
ian-noaa commented 7 months ago

Looks good. Is there an easy way to add to the tests to make sure we don't have a regression?

randytpierce commented 7 months ago

I have been thinking about that, but it isn't really easy. It requires modifying an actual station entry in the database. I might be able to add a fake station. I have done that kind of thing before. I think we should defer it for now, though. randy

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 1:44 PM Ian McGinnis @.***> wrote:

Looks good. Is there an easy way to add to the tests to make sure we don't have a regression?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-GSL/VxIngest/pull/317#issuecomment-1924670649, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGDVQPUSPCYSAOS5WYQQV6LYRVFY5AVCNFSM6AAAAABCXDYGL2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMRUGY3TANRUHE . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Randy Pierce