Open kwilcox opened 8 years ago
first thought -- you are getting close to the dateline there -- darn that round earth!
GNOME can't deal with the dateline, so EVERYTHING needs to be in the same coordinate system that doesn't have a discontinuity won't cross it -- i.e. 0 -- 360 degrees.
However, GOODS should have done the right thing for this, so we'll take a look.
And also not sure if it's related but if you don't get a topology file, then something is going wrong with the spatial index, so that could explain it too.
Kyle, can you confirm that your map, currents, and winds are all in the same coordinates (i.e. from 0-360 or -180-180)? If your subset crossed the dateline then GOODS will export in 0-360. However, if some of your subsetting regions crossed and some didn't then things will not go well in GNOME (your currents and/or winds could be off the map).
I am not sure the topo issue is related. I don't know that we ever added the option to build topo for winds. Maybe Caitlin can weigh in on that...
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Chris Barker notifications@github.com wrote:
first thought -- you are getting close to the dateline there -- darn that round earth!
GNOME can't deal with the dateline, so EVERYTHING needs to be in the same coordinate system that doesn't have a discontinuity won't cross it -- i.e. 0 -- 360 degrees.
However, GOODS should have done the right thing for this, so we'll take a look.
And also not sure if it's related but if you don't get a topology file, then something is going wrong with the spatial index, so that could explain it too.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-ORR-ERD/PyGnome/issues/7#issuecomment-145672529.
@coconnor8 : ideas?
You should be able to export topology for winds if they are curvilinear. No movement does sound like a topology issue though. I'd have to see the file to be sure.
GFS is a regular grid (1/2 degree) so I don't think its a topology issue.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, coconnor8 notifications@github.com wrote:
You should be able to export topology for winds if they are curvilinear. No movement does sound like a topology issue though. I'd have to see the file to be sure.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-ORR-ERD/PyGnome/issues/7#issuecomment-145692870.
Can you show the grid and/or velocities for the winds? Are they showing up on the map ? I think the map and currents may be in -180 to 180 and the winds in > 180.
I took a look at the files and made a script using pygnome to run using these inputs. Everything seems fine with the currents, winds, and map. In fact, everything works fine in pygnome so this is an issue with the creation of the movers in the client -- totally out of my wheelhouse!
Maybe we can have Nathan have a look at it. We're having a GNOME meeting in 5 minutes anyway, so I'll bring it up. Stay tuned!
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:25 AM, coconnor8 notifications@github.com wrote:
Can you show the grid and/or velocities for the winds? Are they showing up on the map ? I think the map and currents may be in -180 to 180 and the winds in > 180.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-ORR-ERD/PyGnome/issues/7#issuecomment-145918765.
@AmyMacFadyen Would you mind sharing the script you wrote for testing with me? Mine may be... less than optimal
Kyle, I emailed you the script but I'll paste it in here just for completeness.
from gnome.model import Model from datetime import datetime, timedelta from gnome.map import MapFromBNA from gnome.movers import GridCurrentMover, GridWindMover from gnome.outputters import Renderer from gnome import scripting from gnome.spill import point_line_release_spill
start_time = datetime(2015, 9, 25, 0, 0) model = Model(start_time=start_time, duration=timedelta(days=3), time_step=60 * 15, #seconds )
mapfile = 'bering-strait.bna' model.map = MapFromBNA(mapfile)
curr_file = 'HYCOM.nc' topology_file = 'HYCOM.topo' current_mover = GridCurrentMover(curr_file, topology_file) model.movers += current_mover
spill = point_line_release_spill(1000,start_position=(190, 64, 0.0),release_time=start_time) model.spills += spill
images_dir = 'currents' scripting.make_images_dir(images_dir) renderer = Renderer(mapfile,images_dir,output_timestep=timedelta(hours=6)) model.outputters += renderer
model.full_run()
wind_file = 'GFS_Global_0p5deg.nc' wind_mover = GridWindMover(wind_file) model.movers += wind_mover
model.outputters.clear() images_dir = 'wind_currents' scripting.make_images_dir(images_dir) renderer = Renderer(mapfile,images_dir,output_timestep=timedelta(hours=6)) model.outputters += renderer
model.full_run()
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Kyle Wilcox notifications@github.com wrote:
@AmyMacFadyen https://github.com/AmyMacFadyen Would you mind sharing the script you wrote for testing with me? Mine may be... less than optima
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-ORR-ERD/PyGnome/issues/7#issuecomment-145929361.
I'm attempting to create a Location for the Bering Strait using HYCOM and GFS data exported from GOODS. It doesn't appear that the GFS data is having any effect on the spill (tested runs with and without the GridWindMover and they are the same). Maybe unrelated but I can't produce a topology file for the GFS data either.
Reproduce
Expected
A file called
hi.topo
in the current directory.Results
No file
hi.topo
in current directory and no exceptions or error messages.