Unrealistic PET values for options (2), (3) and (5)

NOAA-OWP / evapotranspiration

Other

3 stars 9 forks source link

Unrealistic PET values for options (2), (3) and (5) #12

Closed lcunha0118 closed 2 years ago

lcunha0118 commented 2 years ago

PET options (2) aerodynamic, (3) combined, and (5) Penman-Monteith methods are currently providing unreasonable PET values.

Current behavior

Table below shows PET mean annual values (mm/year) for selected CAMELS basins for the five PET options. PET options 2, 3 and 5 present unrealistically high PET values.

Possible causes: unit issues for the input or for the parameters in the config file.

lcunha0118 commented 2 years ago

@ajkhattak please use PET options (1) or (4) for now.

WanruWu-NOAA commented 2 years ago

Modifying momentum-transfer roughness length equation #15

SnowHydrology commented 2 years ago

Closed with PR #13, #15, and #16.