search

NOAA-OWP / noah-owp-modular

Modularized version of the NOAH-MP land surface model.
Other
8 stars 19 forks source link

emitted longwave <0; skin T may be wrong due to inconsistent #112

Closed psbecker closed 2 months ago

psbecker commented 2 months ago

Hi all, I'm trying to run the noah-owp-modular with my own forcing data for a different basin (one in Utah) and got the following message. Additionally, I tried opening the output.nc file for it and the output times give me the year 2038. I'm quite unsure how to address the below issue as my longwave radiation is never less than 0. Any ideas? I'm attaching the forcing file with the formatted text. I wonder if anyone could run the modular with it and let me know if they're getting the same error? moonlake_input.dat.zip

Initializing... Running... emitted longwave <0; skin T may be wrong due to inconsistent input of SHDFAC with LAI 2147483647 2147483647 SHDFAC= 0.699999988 parameters%VAI= 4.65493155 TV= -41113.3789 TG= 36346.2188 LWDN= 245.940002 energy%FIRA= -4.16523674E+09 wa [moonlake_input.dat.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/16167771/moonlake_input.dat.zip) ter%SNOWH= 0.00000000 Exiting ... Note: The following floating-point exceptions are signalling: IEEE_INVALID_FLAG IEEE_OVERFLOW_FLAG IEEE_UNDERFLOW_FLAG

aaraney commented 2 months ago

Hey @psbecker, you might look into this issue thread. Not certain your issue is a result of the same problem, but they seem similar.

SnowHydrology commented 2 months ago

@psbecker We support and maintain Noah-OM for use in the NextGen framework. In our internal evaluations (as @aaraney has pointed out), we have found this error to be triggered as a result of forcing data errors and namelist conflicts. Unfortunately, we cannot evaluate your data formatting, datetime strings, namelist options, etc. Best of luck!