search

NOAA-OWP / wres

Code and scripts for the Water Resources Evaluation Service
Other
2 stars 1 forks source link

As a CBRFC user, I would like to evaluate long-range streamflow forecasts that are archived in a particular flavor of CSV #210

Open epag opened 3 weeks ago

epag commented 3 weeks ago

Author Name: James (James) Original Redmine Issue: 63987, https://vlab.noaa.gov/redmine/issues/63987 Original Date: 2019-05-15

Expected behavior:

Given a requirement to evaluate long-range forecasts that are produced by CBRFC and archived in a particular flavor of CSV, when I consider the options available to help evaluate those forecasts, then I want to choose WRES rather than EVS.

( Which could mean choosing WRES, and then enhancing WRES, but for now they are using EVS ).

Actual behavior:

Reported in #53457. Format example in #53457-7.

Implementation notes:

I've been asked to work on this for the EVS, but I would prefer to work on this for the WRES.

Given that the EVS and WRES have very different concepts of reading, the implementation for EVS is unlikely to be transferable to the WRES.

epag commented 3 weeks ago

Original Redmine Comment Author Name: Hank (Hank) Original Date: 2019-05-15T17:09:47Z

James,

If you receive word from CBRFC that they would like this sooner rather than later, please feel free to bump this to an Urgent priority and assign it to the current development release. CB has been given access to the WRES Deployment Platform and were pointed to the instructions and examples. I would love for them to use WRES for this activity, but they may choose not to due to the headaches of having to move data from AWIPS to the WRES Deployment Platform.

Thanks for writing this ticket,

Hank

epag commented 3 weeks ago

Original Redmine Comment Author Name: James (James) Original Date: 2019-05-15T17:19:18Z

Right. It was partly to give you (and others) a heads up, partly to express a desire to move all evaluation efforts to WRES, partly to express a real requirement for WRES.

Whatever we can do to get RFCs with live evaluation requirements (and existing accounts on WRES) over to the WRES as soon a practicable, I support that.