Closed twfang closed 4 years ago
In order to prepare IPE initial condition for the storm run. A 4-day run with fixed drivers (F10.7=130 and Kp=4) and empirical E field in Nov has been carried out. Below shows the results of the 1st and 4th day run.
2003/11/18
Steady-state result in the 4th day
There seems to have several unrealistic boundaries in IPE for the quiet-time run. I will use the last IPE output for the 2003 storm run.
@IonospherePlasmasphereElectrodynamics If you have old IPE run for Nov/Dec condition, it would be great to do a comparison.
@twfang
Thank you very much for the plots. I got confused. Was 2003/11/21 supposed to be the recovery phase of the storm (the main phase was 11/20) and are those boundaries the response to the storm ?
As for the validation of Nov/Dec, you might be interested to start with fig 1 of this paper for Dec Solstice in 2012 although the plot shows NmF2.
I do not have any runs for November. I am going to run the Nov 2003 event with the old version of IPE.
This is a quiet run using fixed drivers, just for preparing Nov condition for IPE. No storm conditions have been applied yet.
Could you give me the values of those NmF2 from the paper, if you still have them?
Just to document where we are for the run. IPE failed at the first day with the odd initial condition I generated, which was supposed to be the steady-state result).
20031118
20031119
20031120
20031121
I also did a test run without using the new IPE initial condition, the run seems to be more stable with much lower TEC but the Nans did eventually show up on Nov 20.
@Tsu-Wei Fang twfang@hao.ucar.edu
Could you give me the values of those NmF2 from the paper, if you still
have them?
I am really sorry for the delay. you requested the nmf2 values. Yang Yi made the figure, so he has the original data. I can check with him if he still has the data. Also I can check his old archive on HPSS as well. Thanks. Naomi
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:05 PM twfang notifications@github.com wrote:
Could you give me the values of those NmF2 from the paper, if you still have them?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/NOAA-SWPC/WAM-IPE/issues/359?email_source=notifications&email_token=ADIZZYSYXOCABPQ5WX4HQE3QSSNMDA5CNFSM4JKOHTG2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEDOEPCI#issuecomment-551307145, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADIZZYWDO7AAYBQ3ZJO4KVTQSSNMDANCNFSM4JKOHTGQ .
--
Naomi Maruyama CIRES, Univ. of Colorado Boulder NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center phone: +1 303.497.4857 <%28303%29%20497-4857> email: naomi.maruyama@noaa.gov
This issue is to document the WAM-IPE responses to 2003 Nov storm.