Closed jblake59 closed 6 years ago
Approach 1 (from discussions Feb 19/18):
Approach 2 (from Julia's email Feb 19/18):
I feel that approach #2 makes more sense because substitute-h2k.rb has access to the .h2k file contents and could potentially determine what kind of foundation / ventilation requirements that would be needed for code rule sets.
After a discussion with Alex, we have agreed that approach 2 (Julia's suggestion) will work best.
Note that if the .run file does not include an "NA" in every upgrade option list, then there won't be a reference output case generated.
Relocated this issue into -> HTAP v19: 9.36 Ruleset baked in!
Use a variation of Julia's PERL script code to allow for the generation of an appropriate archetype that can be used to run upgrades as specified in a ".run" file. The "RunScope" section of this file describes everything that's required to generate an archetype file for further analysis.