Closed denevers closed 5 years ago
I was confused by all the git conflicts and was just happy to get the new Java code working. The configuration of this is a bit painful.
I have three functions here -- are you saying I should be using schema.org:subjectOf instead of rdfs:seeAlso? I do this in this function now: https://github.com/dblodgett-usgs/chyld_pilot_data_prep/blob/master/rdf_utils.R#L62
What specifically is wrong with the node information? I create all that stuff in here: https://github.com/dblodgett-usgs/chyld_pilot_data_prep/blob/master/node.R and honestly have no recollection of why it is the way it is!
I have three functions here -- are you saying I should be using schema.org:subjectOf instead of rdfs:seeAlso?
yes - this is the ontology we agreed on in Quebec
The node data in node.ttl says that your subject of (content) is our node.
I'm not sure your code will generate proper SELFIE datasets - we changed a couple of predicates (that was the whole discussion in Quebec)
Right -- I wasn't in Quebec. Do you know what else changed?
all your dataset should have this form
https://github.com/opengeospatial/SELFIE/blob/master/docs/examples/rdf/meta-resource-2.ttl
Right -- yeah that's what I was going to look to. I'll get to this later today hopefully.
I think this is fixed now. I don't have "conformsTo" or "provider" content, but these pages look right?
https://cida-test.er.usgs.gov/chyld-pilot/info/hu/041504081604 https://cida-test.er.usgs.gov/chyld-pilot/id/LOD_Node/US_Hydro_LOD_Node
Data pipeline update: https://github.com/dblodgett-usgs/chyld_pilot_data_prep/commit/9d04b4d06f79fb3b84fbeb33c024e268a8da63ea
I deployed this version of the app: https://github.com/dblodgett-usgs/GSIP/tree/java11
for example
https://cida-test.er.usgs.gov/chyld-pilot/info/LOD_Node/US_Hydro_LOD_Node https://cida-test.er.usgs.gov/chyld-pilot/info/hu/041504040205
don't have any representations because the repository still uses
rdfs:seeAlso
instead ofschemas:subjectOf
and node information is not correct either