Closed josephmckinsey closed 2 years ago
Merging #269 (3224131) into master (3788c89) will decrease coverage by
0.27%
. The diff coverage is50.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #269 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 78.54% 78.27% -0.28%
==========================================
Files 43 43
Lines 3570 3438 -132
==========================================
- Hits 2804 2691 -113
+ Misses 766 747 -19
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 78.27% <50.00%> (-0.28%) |
:arrow_down: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/time_series_parser.jl | 70.00% <50.00%> (-0.74%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/InfrastructureSystems.jl | 77.77% <0.00%> (-5.56%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/utils/utils.jl | 64.58% <0.00%> (-1.57%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/utils/print.jl | 52.10% <0.00%> (-1.10%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/utils/generate_structs.jl | 84.68% <0.00%> (-0.91%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/internal.jl | 78.84% <0.00%> (-0.79%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/probabilistic.jl | 77.19% <0.00%> (-0.78%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/scenarios.jl | 83.67% <0.00%> (-0.65%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/deterministic.jl | 81.53% <0.00%> (-0.56%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/utils/recorder_events.jl | 91.39% <0.00%> (-0.53%) |
:arrow_down: |
... and 18 more |
Would you mind also setting a default value for the parameter in the TimeSeriesFileMetadata kwarg constructor? We have some exported function that accept this type, and so this change would ensure we never have a problem with the parameter.
@claytonpbarrows Any updated opinion since yesterday?
Would you mind also setting a default value for the parameter in the TimeSeriesFileMetadata kwarg constructor? We have some exported function that accept this type, and so this change would ensure we never have a problem with the parameter.
Hopefully we don't have a similar problem with TimeSeriesParsedInfo, since simulation is not a kwarg there so making a default parameter would be a breaking change for any callers.
Would you mind also setting a default value for the parameter in the TimeSeriesFileMetadata kwarg constructor? We have some exported function that accept this type, and so this change would ensure we never have a problem with the parameter.
Hopefully we don't have a similar problem with TimeSeriesParsedInfo, since simulation is not a kwarg there so making a default parameter would be a breaking change for any callers.
I think we're OK there because it's only used internally - and only in InfrastructureSystems.
LGTM, thanks everyone
This simulation field seems to have no purpose. We could also remove it very easily (see my branch remove-simulation-field).