Closed asparke2 closed 7 months ago
@mdahlhausen what do you think about the proposed change here to address the issue you identified with the phase II segmentation?
I don't like it; I think it is confusing to lump restaurants together with a significant amount of retail. A less than ideal but workable solution is to make 3 segments: 1) retail with no food service, 2) strip malls with some food service, and 3) stand-alone restaurants.
Solution determined during team discussion:
Non Food-Service Buildings with Small Packaged Units
segment.Food-Service, Freestanding and in Strip Malls with Small Packaged Units
segment is renamed Food-Service Buildings with Small Packaged Units
to indicate that it contains buildings that are 100% food service.Strip Malls with some Food-Service with Small Packaged Units
segment to indicate buildings that are a mix of food-service and non-food-service tenants. Although the upgrades applicable to this segment will look like a mash-up of the first two segments, the savings per floor area for any given upgrade (for example, a cooking equipment retrofit) will be lower because the retrofit will only apply to some of the tenant spaces in the building.
Currently, all RetailStripMall buildings (even those with no food service component) are being assigned to the B: Food-Service, Freestanding and in Strip Malls with Small Packaged Units.
"B: Food-Service, Freestanding and in Strip Malls with Small Packaged Units"
to"B: Buildings with Some Food-Service, Freestanding and in Strip Malls with Small Packaged Units"
So the resulting two segments would be: