NREL / EnergyPlus

EnergyPlus™ is a whole building energy simulation program that engineers, architects, and researchers use to model both energy consumption and water use in buildings.
https://energyplus.net
Other
1.1k stars 384 forks source link

Review and update soil properties in Eng Ref and other docs (CR #8678) #3451

Closed axelstudios closed 8 years ago

axelstudios commented 10 years ago
Added on 2011-12-06 12:09 by @mjwitte

Description

MJW 06 Dec 2011 User questioned the soil property data in the Earth Tube section of the Engineering Ref. Ticket dialog shown below. Probably worth finding some alternate source of data and update this. May also apply to Slab and Basement preprocessor doc and underground pipess? In v7 docs, the original table in question is found in the Eng Ref, pdf p. 1110.

Ooi Koon Beng Posted on: 05 Dec 2011 01:43 AM

According to the 1991 ASHRAE Handbook of HVAC Applications(Table 4, pp. 11.4), the following values are recommended under different conditions.Soil conditionks (W/m░C)?s x 10-7(m2/s)Heavy soil, saturated2.429.04Heavy soil, damp solid masonry1.306.45Heavy soil, dry0.8655.16Light soil, damp--Light soil, dry0.3462.80 The above is on page 1008 of the v6 Engineering Reference. It shows that as the soil gets wetter, the thermal diffusivity increase and suggests that the thermal diffusivity of water is more than 2.80 x 10-7 m2/s. the lesser data for dry soils in the above table. However, the thermal diffusivity of water is only about 1.4 x 10-7 m2/sec and the standard thermal diffusivity used for the undisturbed Ground temperatures in the stat and .ddy files is 0.002322 m2/day or 0.2688 m2 x 10-7 m2/s or one quarter that of water. These contradict the conclusion in the above paragraph. i do not have a copy of the ASHRAE Handbook of HVAC Applications and so i am writing this mail. Sorry for the inconvenience best regardsooi

Michael J. Witte Posted on: 06 Dec 2011 01:04 PM

The numbers you quote below from 1991 ASHRAE are the thermal conductivity values, not the thermal diffusivity.

I no longer have the 1991 handbook, so I cannot verify the data. The newer handbooks are organized differently, so I cannot locate the equivalent table. To add more confusion, from the geothermal energy chapter, properties for soil thermal diffusivity in (m2/day) range from 0.042 to 0.14 with lower water content showing higher diffusivities. I would suggest you find an alternate source of data.

External Ref: Ticket 5122 Last build tested: 11.11.20 V7.0.0.036

mjwitte commented 8 years ago

@mmatts Is this something you could address?

mitchute commented 8 years ago

@mjwitte yes, I can take care of it.

mitchute commented 8 years ago

file000 Table 4, pg. 11.4 ASHRAE Applications Handbook (SI). 1991.

file001

5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20%
Soil Type Dry Density k [W/m-K] alpha [m2/s] k [W/m-K] alpha [m2/s] k [W/m-K] alpha [m2/s] k [W/m-K] alpha [m2/s]
Coarse 100% Sand 1922 2.77 1.34E-06 2.94 1.24E-06 3.29 1.18E-06
1602 1.90 1.18E-06 2.34 1.18E-06 2.51 1.08E-06 2.68 8.82E-07
1281 1.38 1.18E-06 1.56 9.14E-07 1.56 8.06E-07 1.47 6.99E-07
Fine Grain 100% Clay 1922 1.21 5.91E-07 1.21 4.84E-07 1.64 5.70E-07
1602 0.95 5.70E-07 0.95 4.73E-07 1.12 4.73E-07 1.21 5.16E-07
1281 0.69 4.84E-07 0.74 4.62E-07 0.81 4.73E-07 0.87 4.09E-07

Table 3.3 pg. 26 ASHRAE Ground Source Heat Pumps--Design of Geothermal Systems for Commercial and Institutional Buildings. 1997.

capture

Soils kg/m3 W/m-K m^2/s
Heavy clay 15% water 1922 1.558 5.914E-07
5% water 1922 1.212 6.452E-07
Light clay 15% water 1281 0.865 4.624E-07
5% water 1281 0.692 4.839E-07
Heavy sand 15% water 1922 3.115 1.129E-07
5% water 1922 2.596 1.344E-06
Light sand 15% water 1281 1.558 8.065E-07
5% water 1281 1.385 9.677E-07

Table 4, pg. 34.6 ASHRAE Applications Handbook (SI). 2015.

It looks like the soil property values in the Engineering Reference are have a few mistakes. I propose updating it with the above two SI tables. That OK with you @Myoldmopar and @mjwitte?

mjwitte commented 8 years ago

Sounds reasonable.

Myoldmopar commented 8 years ago

Yeah, that would be great.

Myoldmopar commented 8 years ago

Closed via #5401