Open aaron-boranian opened 6 years ago
This issue is related to Issue 6651. A related PR seeks to provide EnergyPlus with enhanced g-function calculation (both more accurate and faster).
Auto-sizing a GSHP may need to include both selection and sizing of a field. The following is a proposed new input that would be required:
GSHP sizing is currently not available. I would like to see this allowed for GroundHeatExchanger:Vertical. Some version could also be implemented for GroundHeatExchanger:Pond, GroundHeatExchanger:Surface, GroundHeatExchanger:HorizontalTrench, GroundHeatExchanger:Slinky.
Using the example of GroundHeatExchanger:Vertical, the following fields should be autosizable:
design flow rate number of bore holes
Bore hole length, radius, and ground properties would still need to be defined.
Migrated from UserVoice