New Verbiage Changes - Githubissues

New verbiage changes from discussion with DOE and research team Link

[x] Welcome to JUSTIFI message -> Use this tool to identify and estimate the potential non-energy benefits that could be generated during the energy assessment.
[x] Explore NEBs message -> Explore potential energy efficiency opportunities with Non ...
[x] Contact card -> Role -> title, remove focus area
[x] Find KPIs 1. title add (KPIs) acronym, 2. Find common KPIs -> potential KPIs, KPI's -> KPIs
[x] KPI detail: quantitative or qualitative metric -> metric type
[x] End Uses Inventory sidebar -> End Use Inventory
[x] Pre-assessment/assessment page: Visit Date/Scheduled for -> assessment date
[x] Energy Opp: 1. Title Energy Opportunities -> Energy Efficiency Opportunities, 2. Add a subtitle "Energy Efficiency Opportunity", 3. +Add Energy Opportunity -> delete Energy, 4. Remove Energy from default name, "Energy Opportunity Notes", 5. Details message: Provide details about this energy efficiency opportunity.
[x] Non-Energy Benefits description -> Use + Add NEB to add Non-Energy Benefits () that are directly associated with this opportunity.” Remove: the second sentence “Use the…database for potential NEBs.”
[x] Reports: Non-opportunity Energy Savings/total Non-opportunity savings -> Additional Operational Benefits

Documentation team to revisit later:

Welcome message: revisit this intro sentence to capture how identifying NEBs should bring attention to the broader impacts of energy efficiency opportunities
KPI naming convention, for example, Reduce Expense Cost
update KPI description text
revisit Industrial system inventory field names, review the field names that will change based on the Industrial System selected above
NEB card: Revisit the terminology “Performance Metric” and “Impacts”
NEBs tab: revisit this page when implementing a section for the NEBs that can’t be tied to a particular Energy Eff Opp,
NEB tab: Revisit this page when additionally implementing a section for NEBs that all in the same category and are best represented as a cumulative/aggregate calculation
Report: Savings need consistency throughout? Revisit the words around savings/cost/benefits/impact

NREL / NEB-Tool