Kestrel

[nmerket]

Fixes #313

A start at getting it to work on Kestrel.

Checklist

Not all may apply

• [x] Code changes (must work)
• [x] Tests exercising your feature/bug fix (check coverage report on Checks -> BuildStockBatch Tests -> Artifacts)
• [x] Coverage has increased or at least not decreased. Update minimum_coverage in .github/workflows/ci.yml as necessary.
• [x] All other unit and integration tests passing
• [x] Update validation for project config yaml file changes
• [x] Update existing documentation
• [x] Run a small batch run on Eagle to make sure it all works if you made changes that will affect Eagle
• [x] Run a small batch run on Kestrel to make sure it all works if you made changes that will affect Kestrel
• [x] Add to the changelog_dev.rst file and propose migration text in the pull request
• [x] Change from singularity to apptainer.

[github-actions[bot]]

File	Coverage
All files	86%	:white_check_mark:
base.py	90%	:white_check_mark:
exc.py	57%	:white_check_mark:
hpc.py	78%	:white_check_mark:
local.py	70%	:white_check_mark:
postprocessing.py	84%	:white_check_mark:
utils.py	91%	:white_check_mark:
cloud/docker_base.py	93%	:white_check_mark:
sampler/base.py	79%	:white_check_mark:
sampler/downselect.py	33%	:white_check_mark:
sampler/precomputed.py	93%	:white_check_mark:
sampler/residential_quota.py	61%	:white_check_mark:
test/shared_testing_stuff.py	85%	:white_check_mark:
test/test_docker.py	33%	:white_check_mark:
test/test_validation.py	97%	:white_check_mark:
workflow_generator/base.py	90%	:white_check_mark:
workflow_generator/commercial.py	53%	:white_check_mark:
workflow_generator/residential_hpxml.py	86%	:white_check_mark:

Minimum allowed coverage is 33%

Generated by :monkey: cobertura-action against 34613167b50d3f24239a4dca3d0f0dd8dd750c03

[nmerket]

It just occurred to me that a venv created by one user might not be able to be used by another user (which was possible with conda). We should check that and ensure it works, and if not, switch back to conda.

[afontani]

This would be a nice to have feature: Issue 171

[nmerket]

This would be a nice to have feature: Issue 171

@afontani Let's add that once we have a better handle on what the appropriate limits are on Kestrel.