Closed daniel-thom closed 2 years ago
Here is what we brainstormed today.
{
"common_parameters": {
"total_load(kVABase)": 851.8510687146893,
"total_load(kW)": 829.4206366308418,
"total_PV(kW)": 1658.8400000000001,
"total_PV(kVARated)": 1658.8400000000001
},
"stage_results":
[
{
"stage": "Initial",
"source_bus": "p12udt1277-p12uhs0_1247x",
"feeder_head_name": "feeder_p12udt1277-p12uhs0_1247x",
"feeder_head_basekv": 12.5,
"source_num_nodes": 3,
"total_num_buses_in_circuit": 366,
"substation_xfmr": null,
"num_buses": 366,
"num_nodes": 695,
"num_loads": 248,
"num_lines": 295,
"num_transformers": 70,
"num_pv_systems": 78,
"num_capacitors": 1,
"num_regulators": 0
}
]
}
The upgrades module generates a
feeder_stats.json
output file. It has two fields at the top level:before_upgrades
andafter_upgrades
. Each of those entries contains an output object. The filesthermal_summary.json
andvoltage_summary.json
use a different format. They report the data as an array of output objects where each object has a field calledstage
which can beInitial
orFinal
.Should these be consistent?