Open calmc opened 1 month ago
Another proposed fix: Start with EIA estimates of industry energy use by state (EIA SEDS) and allocate to facilities that aren't captured by the approaches that use NEI and GHGRP data to derive energy estimates.
Another thought: it might be helpful to see Issue #9 and better understand which facilities are missing energy estimates (or have energy estimates = 0) AND are NEI-reporters (i.e., have an EIS ID).
Intro
There is an audience for and update to the Industry Energy Databook (IEDB) all-industry energy data estimates at the county-level. The IEDB used establishment counts by NAICS code, employment size class, and county from Census County Business Patterns data, together with energy intensity values calculated from Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS) data (see the code), for part of its energy estimation process for facilities that do not have large enough GHG emissions to report to the EPA's GHGRP. The employment size class was used to differentiate the energy intensities of facilities that are different sizes. This differentiation follows MECS data from Table 6.4.
Problem
Disclosure rules were changed between the 2016 and 2017 CBP releases and now most of the establishment counts are withheld. So, the same process used by the IEDB to estimate county-level energy use can't be used now. There needs to be a new way of estimating energy use for facilities that would've been covered by this approach.
Proposed Fixes