codecov-commenter
commented
10 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
7dd36a5) 87.06% compared to head (fefc91a) 87.11%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #441 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 87.06% 87.11% +0.05% ========================================== Files 122 122 Lines 17150 17163 +13 ========================================== + Hits 14932 14952 +20 + Misses 2218 2211 -7 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/NREL/reV/pull/441/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=NREL) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/NREL/reV/pull/441/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=NREL) | `87.11% <ø> (+0.05%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=NREL#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Fixed typo in the reV losses demo