Report scaled capital cost in output supply curve

[ppinchuk]

When specifying an EOS curve, we were reporting the EOS multiplier and the scaled LCOE but not the scaled capital cost. This PR now also outputs the scaled capital cost value in the SC, which is needed for downstream models like ReEDS.

Also report cost values and annual energy for each supply curve based on its capacity.

[ppinchuk]

@grantbuster this PR is based on what we discussed this morning. Let me know if you see any red flags or if I am missing anything here

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.22%. Comparing base (4a0fd31) to head (a8b55a0).

Files	Patch %	Lines
reV/supply_curve/points.py	97.29%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #447 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 87.14% 87.22% +0.08% ========================================== Files 122 122 Lines 17248 17305 +57 ========================================== + Hits 15030 15094 +64 + Misses 2218 2211 -7 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/NREL/reV/pull/447/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=NREL) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/NREL/reV/pull/447/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=NREL) | `87.22% <98.00%> (+0.08%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=NREL#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.