Open joseph-robertson opened 7 months ago
This PR has identified a bug in how OS-HPXML calculates detailed utility bills for homes with modeled batteries. ~The fix is here: https://github.com/NREL/OpenStudio-HPXML/pull/1554.~
The fix is here: https://github.com/NREL/OpenStudio-HPXML/pull/1555.
Seems unlikely that you could ever use a single schedule across all buildings in the housing stock. Maybe it should be like detailed utility rates, where you can point to files based on a specified parameter?
Seems unlikely that you could ever use a single schedule across all buildings in the housing stock. Maybe it should be like detailed utility rates, where you can point to files based on a specified parameter?
Yeah, I thought about that too. I think the idea in using the options_lookup, is that the schedule could differ by option for a given parameter. That's essentially the same approach used for detailed utility rates, except that the mapping is pulled out into its own lookup so as to support multiple scenarios.
True, I guess you can always create a new TSV parameter for use in options_lookup to ensure you apply the desired schedule to a given building.
Now that https://github.com/NREL/OpenStudio-HPXML/pull/1555 has been merged, we can think about how to support assigning detailed schedules to dwelling units in the housing stock. Ideas we have so far:
xxx_schedule
filepath arguments in ResStockArguments; assign them using the options_lookup
Pull Request Description
Adds ResStockArguments arguments:
heating_setpoint_schedule
cooling_setpoint_schedule
water_heater_setpoint_schedule
battery_schedule
Update ResStockArguments measure to populate
schedules_filepaths
based on the contents of these new arguments. Update an arbitrary Battery option to assignbattery_schedule
. Only the testing project samples battery options.Checklist
Not all may apply:
openstudio tasks.rb update_measures
has been run