Open anderspeders opened 7 years ago
This sounds straightforward (and promising, that it would be a valuable addition).
cc. @deirdrelee - comments?
Thanks @mattfullerton, do you have a sense of the time required for scoping. I think at this stage we would like to understand complementarity around tagging and countries covered.
Looks interesting, let's discuss in today's meeting
I think we've clarified that the idea would be to offer up the RGI docs to the platform is possible, we're happy to do this by pushing or by offering assistance to their team for pulling as required.
I've removed the milestone pending decision on what we need to do.
Why
The extractives hub hosts +5,000 documents, guides and primary sources relevant to extractives.
The repository recently launched at this URL:
https://beta.extractiveshub.org/resource/list
What
In order to understand better the linkages and complementarity of the Extractives Hub and the RGI Source Library as document sources we would like to request a brief scoping of the use of metadata tags for documents in the Extractives Hub. This should include a review of the documents available here: https://beta.extractiveshub.org/resource/list
Documents appears to be grouped by:
In additions - are any metadata tags used which do not appear on the front end as searchable?