Closed danielballan closed 6 years ago
We could also just call the package nslsii or nsls_ii and drop the 'tools'. I kind of like that.
I've been thinking, why not just call the repo nsls2tools
as well ? Then we are consistent ?
This is a package to convert nsls into tools? ;)
I like naming the package nslsii
I also like nslsii
. When this was raised in the past, someone (don't recall who) raised the concern that it squats too broad of a scope. In my opinion, a Python library that provides data acquisition and analysis tools for all NSLS-II beamlines is sufficiently broad to claim nslsii
on PyPI.
Done.
I didn't catch this inconsistency when reviewing #2. Our choices are: