Closed nheeren closed 2 years ago
Okay, I have an idea how to fix it. What would you suggest then as the RES2.1 and RES2.2 options? Let's remember that it's a foundation, so wood is not a good option. Maybe something like 15 cm concrete for RES0 and 10 cm concrete for all the other cases?
(On another note, I have impression that the options RES2.1 and RES2.1+RES2.2 are the same - based on simulation results and a brief look at the construction types)
I would say the foundation is always concrete, regardless the RES. RES2.2 and RES2.1+RES2.2 can have 20% reduced concrete amount.
Yes, RES2.1 and RES2.1+RES2.2 are fairly similar. However, the latter should have less wood in some elements.
Should be fixed now!
Awesome! Thank you so much. That should solve it for now.
I made a little change, because in some IDFs I did not specify the RES.
Originally posted by @kamilitsa in https://github.com/nheeren/BuildME/issues/47#issuecomment-1092120438
Thank you again for coming up with this (i.e.
add_underground_wall_cfactor()
andadd_ground_floor_ffactor()
)! However, I now realize this actually causes quite an issue that we hadn't considered.The thicknesses for concrete are hard-coded, e.g. https://github.com/nheeren/BuildME/blob/39277676019e0aefe4deb6f37da278b1e6005e54/BuildME/idf.py#L479-L485
Thus we cannot manipulate them anymore with the
res-replaceme
string.