Open nianzelee opened 4 years ago
@yen-shi , could you please take a look into this issue, if you happen to have some spare time?
@perry0513 , could you please comment more on your findings about this bug?
Hi @nianzelee and @yen-shi !
With the greedy minimization turned on, the solver reports probability 9.755859e-01
with the assignment of the existential variables being
-1 -2 -3 4 -5 -6 ... -12 13 14 15 ... 41 42
However, if the existential assignment
-1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 ... -12 13 14 15 ... 41 42
is applied (by adding them as unit clauses to the formula), the solver produces probability 9.833984e-01
.
The problem with the -g
option also arises in the instance er-random-k-CNF/rand-3-30-150-15.57.sdimacs
.
The solver produces a wrong result on the test case
benchmarks/ssatER/MaxCount/sdimacs/MaxSAT-keller4-1212.clq.wcnf.sdimacs
.The reported probability is
9.755859e-01
with the default configuration, i.e., runningHowever, if the greedy minimization is turned off,
The reported probability becomes
8.520508e-01
.The discrepancy clearly indicates a bug.