Closed timuralp closed 3 years ago
@pbinkley, as the original author of the project, do you have any objections to the licensing change?
GPL was a curious choice given that this project is mostly config files with a few scripts. You need to get permission from all the contributors to relicense the project or remove their contributions. git shortlog -s
says that there are 10 contributors. You have my permission to relicense under either Apache or MIT licenses. Good luck!
@gaul good point!
@daniellawrence @diwu1989 @The-Alchemist @majewsky @shooding @thiagodasilva you've all made contributions to this project. Can I have your permission to change the license to Apache 2.0 license?
LGTM
On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 11:56 AM Timur Alperovich notifications@github.com wrote:
@gaul https://github.com/gaul good point!
@daniellawrence https://github.com/daniellawrence @diwu1989 https://github.com/diwu1989 @The-Alchemist https://github.com/The-Alchemist @majewsky https://github.com/majewsky @shooding https://github.com/shooding @thiagodasilva https://github.com/thiagodasilva you've all made contributions to this project. Can I have your permission to change the license to Apache 2.0 license?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/swiftstack/docker-swift/issues/52#issuecomment-754995090, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGG275X5QF4DR7TJ4YRBTTSYOYLDANCNFSM4VWRWMCQ .
👍 You have my permission to relicense to Apache 2.0.
You have my permission.
@kahing sorry I forgot to tag you in the above request!
You have my permission to relicense under either Apache or MIT licenses.
permission granted
There are 5 contributions that we didn't get an acknowledgement from. I believe they are minor. Commit summaries:
I'll work on either removing these commits or getting an approval from the authors.
this is fine, thanks
permission granted
Thank you all! I received guidance that switching the license needs to be more formal than our agreement in this GitHub issue. At the same time, we (at NVIDIA) no longer have a need internally to pursue a different license. I'm going to close this issue for the time being.
I propose switching to Apache 2.0 license from GPLv2 for less scrutiny in any corporate use cases, while maintaining the same permissiveness. Here is a blurb on compatibility (or lack thereof) between these licenses: https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html. The incompatibility requires an explicit agreement for the switch.