This object also includes a forward reference to the (yet-to-be-created) resource claim of the MIG enabled GPU on which this MIG device should be created (shared-gpu). Note this is the name of the resource claim itself, not the claim parameters object we called mig-enabled-gpu
If so, this may be ambiguous and we should update it to avoid ambiguity:
Hi, I noticed that
GpuClaimParametersName
is the name of theResourceClaim
and not theGpuClaimParameters
,right?https://github.com/NVIDIA/k8s-dra-driver/blob/b6c7aae2b87d857668f417689462da752090406f/api/nvidia.com/resource/gpu/v1alpha1/migclaim.go#L29
Refer to https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BNWqgx_SmZDi-va_V31v3DnuVwYnF2EmN7D-O_fB6Oo:
If so, this may be ambiguous and we should update it to avoid ambiguity:
GpuClaimParametersName -> GpuResourceClaimName