Thank you for the great work on this project! I am currently using the code and have some questions regarding the storage size calculation of the hash grid.
I noticed some discrepancies in the expected and actual storage sizes. Could you please clarify how the storage size for the hash grid is calculated in your implementation? Specifically:
the param size is correct here: (256**2+128**2+64**2+32**2+16**2+8**2+4**2+2**2)*8 = 699040, since the coarest level with 2**2 features would be aligned with 8, so the final param size should be: (256**2+128**2+64**2+32**2+16**2+8**2+4**2+8)*8 = 699072
The correct number of params should be: (2**2+4**2)*8=160, while the 2**2 would be aligned with 8, so the final param size would be: (8+4**2)*8=192, which is different from the real results.
It really confused me. Did I miss something? I appreciate any insight you can provide. Thanks in advance for your assistance!
Thank you for the great work on this project! I am currently using the code and have some questions regarding the storage size calculation of the hash grid.
I noticed some discrepancies in the expected and actual storage sizes. Could you please clarify how the storage size for the hash grid is calculated in your implementation? Specifically:
the param size is correct here:
(256**2+128**2+64**2+32**2+16**2+8**2+4**2+2**2)*8 = 699040
, since the coarest level with2**2
features would be aligned with8
, so the final param size should be:(256**2+128**2+64**2+32**2+16**2+8**2+4**2+8)*8 = 699072
Another case is as following:
the param size is:
(1)*8=8
, but the number of features should be aligned with8
, so the final param is8*8=64
However, the following case seems to be incorrect:
The correct number of params should be:
(2**2+4**2)*8=160
, while the2**2
would be aligned with8
, so the final param size would be:(8+4**2)*8=192
, which is different from the real results.It really confused me. Did I miss something? I appreciate any insight you can provide. Thanks in advance for your assistance!