Closed damonmcc closed 7 months ago
Hi @jackrosacker, just wanted to start getting down some specifics around outputs for this and make sure we're on the same page as you. @AmandaDoyle @croswell81 for visibility
We sort of have two broad issues
Breaking these into two categories
En route to producing final outputs, we have intermediate tables with buffered geoms. The tables look something like this (imagine those geoms are in 2263) | variable | id | buffered_geom |
---|---|---|---|
elevated_railway | 14 STREET/CANARSIE LINE | POLYGON ((-73.91110564962213 40.685452360859514, -73.91110564954899 40.68545236162799) | |
elevated_railway | 6 AVENUE LINE | POLYGON ((-73.91110564962213 40.685452360859514, -73.91110564954899 40.68545236162799) |
variable
corresponding to the unique variable that there can be a flag for, id
being a unique identifier of a given variable within its variable type. There are some outstanding questions on how these should be exported
variable
("elevated_railway" in this case), or 1 table that has "elevated_railway", "air_vent", "cat_permit", etcvariable
, rather than 1 geom per id (in this case, segment of elevated railway)We were planning on having our "long" table of flags included, let us know if you'd prefer us to leave it out. In this table, each row is a "flag". Any bbls with no flags will not be found in this table | bbl | variable | variable_id |
---|---|---|---|
1000010001 | elevated_railway | 14 STREET/CANARSIE LINE | |
1000010001 | edesignation_noise | 1 | |
1000010002 | elevated_railway | 14 STREET/CANARSIE LINE |
This could also include a "distance" column (for geospatial flags - edes in this case doesn't apply), for distance from noted variable
We are also going to include some form of wide format | bbl | elevated_railway | edesignsation_noise | ... |
---|---|---|---|---|
1000010001 | 14 STREET/CANARSIE LINE | 1 | ... | |
1000010002 | 14 STREET/CANARSIE LINE | NULL |
... |
There was also desire for some explicitly binary output, using 1
or 0
for easy calculation within [name of esri product]
A few questions to be resolved
For binary output, would you want them as additional columns in the same wide table? Or a separate table? | bbl | elevated_railway | elevated_railway_bool | edesignation_noise | edesignation_noise_bool | ... |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1000010001 | 14 STREET/CANARSIE LINE | 1 | 1 | 1 | ... | |
1000010002 | 14 STREET/CANARSIE LINE | 1 | NULL |
0 | ... |
1
in the bool column)variables
? Have them in a nicer display name rather than "elevated_railway", or include the question they map to. The latter might be a bit tougher in the wide format (at least in terms of including all relevant variable
metadata), but we can figure something outIs there anything missing in above summary? Say, a lookup table of variable, data source it comes from, question it relates to, etc.
@damonmcc was under the impression that one gdb might be the most convenient, is that true?
The survey GIS is making must display the flags for all BBLs in PLUTO and the spatial source data that was used in the flag logic.
Goals
notes