During the 24v1 review, GIS identified this issue:
dfta_contracts: SENIOR SERVICES facsubgrp dropped from 75 to zero record count
Why
When creating the qc_diff table used in the QA review, we filter out records with empty values in the geom column. It appears that dfta_contracts records weren't getting geocoded by geosupport in the beginning of the build. Specifically, the source zip code column name changed in this data version, and our code silently failed, returning empty values from geosupport
Related to #461.
What
During the 24v1 review, GIS identified this issue:
dfta_contracts
: SENIOR SERVICES facsubgrp dropped from 75 to zero record countWhy
When creating the
qc_diff
table used in the QA review, we filter out records with empty values in thegeom
column. It appears thatdfta_contracts
records weren't getting geocoded bygeosupport
in the beginning of the build. Specifically, the source zip code column name changed in this data version, and our code silently failed, returning empty values fromgeosupport
Solution: fix zip code column name
Build here.
As can be seen, now
dfta_contracts
records are getting geocoded:count_new
is not zero.Old records for comparison: