Closed SPTKL closed 3 years ago
When comparing to metadata from previous years, we are missing the following variables:
variablename | release_year | profile | category | base |
---|---|---|---|---|
mhnw | 2006-2010, 2013-2017 | Social | Household Type | hh1 |
mhnwchu18 | 2006-2010, 2013-2017 | Social | Household Type | hh1 |
fhnh | 2006-2010, 2013-2017 | Social | Household Type | hh1 |
fhnhchu18 | 2006-2010, 2013-2017 | Social | Household Type | hh1 |
mv80t89 | 2013-2017 | Housing | Year Householder Moved Into Unit | ochu3 |
mvbf79 | 2013-2017 | Housing | Year Householder Moved Into Unit | ochu3 |
this is understandable
If P=100, Z= 0
The missing variables were all replaced by different variables/variable codes
variablename | release_year | profile | category | base |
---|---|---|---|---|
Y2015-2019 | Economic | nan | ||
Y2015-2019 | Economic | nan | ||
Y2015-2019 | Economic | nan | ||
mvbf89 | Y2015-2019 | Housing | ochu3 | |
mhns | Y2006-2010, Y2015-2019 | Social | hh1 | |
mhnschu18 | Y2006-2010, Y2015-2019 | Social | hh1 | |
lgruspol2 | Y2015-2019 | Social | pop5pl2 | |
lgruspol1 | Y2015-2019 | Social | lgruspol1 | |
lgrsplep2 | Y2015-2019 | Social | lgoenlep2 | |
lgrsplep1 | Y2015-2019 | Social | lgruspol1 | |
fhns | Y2006-2010, Y2015-2019 | Social | hh1 | |
fhnschu18 | Y2006-2010, Y2015-2019 | Social | hh1 | |
cvnid_vsnp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvnipop1 | |
cvnid_scrp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvnipop1 | |
cvnid_ildp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvnipop1 | |
cvnid_hrgp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvnipop1 | |
cvnid_cogp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvnipop1 | |
cvnid_ambp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvnipop1 | |
cu18dvsnp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvniu18_1 | |
cu18dscrp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvniu18_1 | |
cu18dhrgp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvniu18_1 | |
cu18dcogp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvniu18_1 | |
cu18dambp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvniu18_1 | |
c1864dvsnp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cni1864_1 | |
c1864dscrp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cni1864_1 | |
c1864dildp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cni1864_1 | |
c1864dhrgp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cni1864_1 | |
c1864dcogp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cni1864_1 | |
c1864dambp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cni1864_1 | |
c65pldvsnp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvni65pl | |
c65pldscrp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvni65pl | |
c65pldildp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvni65pl | |
c65pldhrgp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvni65pl | |
c65pldcogp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvni65pl | |
c65pldambp | Y2015-2019 | Social | cvni65pl |
The variables with a base of cvnipop1, cvniu18_1, and cvni65pl are not new, the P was just pulled from the data this time instead of calculated (in this case for boroughs and NYC). No change needed on the front-end.
mvbf89 is not a new variable. Already displayed in the front-end as 'Moved in 1989 or earlier'
The remaining variables from the social profile that changed were submitted in a user story with the new front-end wording to be displayed.
@EricaMaurer are we supposed to use these p variables? e.g.
the p value for c65pldamb
should come out of c65pldambp
etc for borough and city level? Data Engineering didn't know about this
You can ignore this
For medians, if cumulative frequency = 0, do we set the estimate to NULL or 0?missing variables, based on metadata comparison> these variables were replaced by different variables/variable codes