Open hugovk opened 4 years ago
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/5fc7fc52-4720-11e9-b83b-0c525dad548f
in time for #nanogenmo and #NaNoWriMo2019 we are announcing a call for #computergenerated manuscripts -- prize of $150 and publication 😁 #writinglife #WritingCommunity
https://aiweirdness.com/post/189170306297/how-to-begin-a-novel
https://blog.steveasleep.com/lets-generate-some-imaginary-guitar-pedals
About #95
https://daydal.us/novelgen-2019/
About a GPT-2 entry (not posted here?), part of the conclusion:
This alludes to the larger issue: the algorithm has no knowledge or real intelligence. It's simply spitting out text that statistically matches the source text (at a word by word and syntax level). It has no knowledge of what words mean. Large sections of text contradict themselves and gpt-2 would be none the wiser. This can lead to a whimsical, Suessian quality to the output, but for writing something rigorous or logically intact, it's no better than a Markov Chain.
The NaNoGenMo 2019 Roundup https://medium.com/@greg_p_kennedy/computers-writing-books-54628883d2b8
References #32, #103, #46, #80, #93, #121, #102, #131, #39, #25, #118, #115, #29, #129, #141, #72, #65, #17, #101, #147, #95, #134, #136, #28, #104, #61, #19, #31, #27, #68, #127, #83, #144, #92, #137, #8, and #81
https://judithvanstegeren.com/blog/2020/alice-eve-nanogenmo-narrative-generation-poster.html
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/the-mechanical-muse
Cites @moonmilk's https://github.com/dariusk/NaNoGenMo/issues/80
Links to previous years: