Open ssaxnagios opened 7 years ago
We will discuss this at our next meeting.
Isn't this exactly what the non-sticky ACK would do? Description is: future notifications about problems are temporarily disabled until the service changes from its current state. - So it should alert if it goes from WARN to CRIT.
The sticky_plus option (or whatever you want to call it) would include the standard sticky functionality but would also alert if it went from one problem state to a different problem state (but wouldn't alert for the warning because it's stickied).
So like this:
Say you have a drive space check that is currently at a warning and you acknowledge it so you don't get any warning notifications.
Now you don't want any warning notifications but you do want to get a problem to problem state change notification (whether it's warn to crit OR warn to unknown (currently unknowns reset the ack)).
That way it won't notify on the warnings but if it does go to critical they will get a notification that they can act on.