Hello, after reading your paper, I feel that the viewpoint is very novel. However, if the PINN parameter and PIXEL parameter settings are the same (f-scale is 1, num init is 5000, num train is 5000, n-cells is 16, cell dim is 4, cell size is 16, and other parameters are the same), it seems that PIXEL is not as effective as PINN, or even worse. Is it a setup issue or a code issue?
Actually, our model PIXEL works with large numbers of input train points. (almost 100,000)
with 5000 train points, PIXEL is expected low performance...
Hello, after reading your paper, I feel that the viewpoint is very novel. However, if the PINN parameter and PIXEL parameter settings are the same (f-scale is 1, num init is 5000, num train is 5000, n-cells is 16, cell dim is 4, cell size is 16, and other parameters are the same), it seems that PIXEL is not as effective as PINN, or even worse. Is it a setup issue or a code issue?