Thank you for your amazing software package. It is no big issue but I am always a bit irritated when seeing the progress estimates when running meep e.g.
subpixel-averaging is 6.68749% done, 55.8381 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 12.2589% done, 28.6371 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 17.3983% done, 19.0087 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 22.3127% done, 13.9325 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 27.155% done, 10.7399 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 31.8264% done, 8.57822 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 36.3807% done, 7.00073 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 40.8811% done, 5.78909 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 45.3184% done, 4.82662 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 49.7377% done, 4.04236 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 54.1751% done, 3.38955 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 58.4594% done, 2.84773 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 62.9417% done, 2.35727 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 67.2891% done, 1.9467 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 71.8794% done, 1.56742 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 76.7488% done, 1.21236 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 81.4291% done, 0.913055 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 86.4875% done, 0.62555 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 91.9509% done, 0.350244 s remaining
subpixel-averaging is 98.1164% done, 0.0767999 s remaining
The reason the remaining time does not fall linearly as expected is equation
Thank you for your amazing software package. It is no big issue but I am always a bit irritated when seeing the progress estimates when running meep e.g.
The reason the remaining time does not fall linearly as expected is equation
https://github.com/NanoComp/meep/blob/0d4050cd3314c532bfc326192bc98fd948969195/src/anisotropic_averaging.cpp#L276
I think it should be normalized not to ipixel but rather the amount of pixels since the last pixel. I think something like
might do the job.