Open leSemaleon opened 9 months ago
There is a layer of copper, specified through epsilon (-75000) and conductivity
Note that a frequency-independent negative $\varepsilon$ is unstable. There are two options: (1) use Cu from the materials library or (2) fit the $\varepsilon(\lambda)$ profile yourself using a Drude-Lorentzian fit.
Also, conductivity can be used to model complex $\varepsilon$ and only over a narrow bandwidth. Conductivity cannot be used to model negative $\varepsilon$ which is purely real (i.e., lossless).
When I used Cu from library, fields became infinity in some step, so I begun use epsilon with conductivity
Hello, I model metasurfaces and their spectral properties. There is a layer of copper, specified through epsilon (-75000) and conductivity, and a layer of polypropylene - epsilon 2.3, conductivity ~10^-4. The spectrum turns out to be jagged, which I cannot explain. Moreover, if you make the epsilon of polypropylene closer to 1, then the spectrum is smoothed out. It seems that such a change in epsilon should not affect the spectrum since the radiation comes from a metal with epsilon -75000, and compared to this, 1 or 2 makes no difference. Spectra are attached. With epsilon = 2 With epsilon = 1