Closed NanoMeow closed 5 years ago
Fixed in russian filters.
Test link: https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/5bd826899a7947a097b0a87d
Category: anti-adblock
Reported from: Kazakhstan
Template version: 2
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.77 Safari/537.36 Extension: Nano Defender 15.0.0.66
Test link: https://www.rbc.ru/
Category: anti-adblock
Reported from: Russia
Template version: 2
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:63.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/63.0 Extension: Nano Defender 15.0.0.66
Test link: https://www.rbc.ru/
Category: anti-adblock
Reported from: United States
Template version: 2
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/70.0.3538.77 Safari/537.36 Extension: Nano Defender 15.0.0.66
@okiehsch Tried Russian regional filter, doesn't seem to work.
rbc.ru##+js(abort-on-property-read.js, RA.eventManager)
but that breaks search.
Tried Russian regional filter
Adguard will not fix the issue, https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/issues/24402
"AdGuard continues to fulfill its direct responsibility - to block ads and tracking. We cannot bypass the requirement of a paid subscription. Conventionally, we have the technical possibility of making Yandex music free for you to do, but we do not do it, it's just illegal."
It's not a paywall, it doesn't appear if the page is whitelisted. It's not any different than other hard anti-adblock, except that this one shows a message that promote their paid subscription.
I know, I don't understand that quote either, maybe something got lost in translation.
I think a setTimeout
filter will work without breaking search, I am looking for one.
rbc.ru##+js(setTimeout-defuser.js, t=null, 300)
works for me.
Fixed.
It's not a paywall, it doesn't appear if the page is whitelisted.
off-topic @jspenguin2017 just as a follow up, adguard seems to define a paywall in a slightly different way, if an anti-adblock message gives the user the choice to pay instead of seeing ads, they consider it a paywall and will not circumvent it. https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdguardFilters/issues/24208
@okiehsch That is just ridiculous. Since the paywall doesn't show without AdGuard, can we say AdGuard is illegally placing paywalls on other people's websites?
They do it for legal reasons, there was a big case this year in germany and if you read the court decision, you can certainly make the argument that, if an adblocker is in a competitive relationship with publishers and therefore falls under competition law, it is illegal to circumvent anti-adblock messages by the publisher.
Why adguard concludes that there is a difference between an anti-adblock message that gives the user no choice and a message that gives the choice of paying is beyond me.
I thought that was ABP charging publishers for whitelist, AdGuard isn't doing that though.
They are a company and as such are in a competitive relationship with publishers.
The court does not actually say it is illegal to circumvent anti-adblock messages by the publisher, because ABP does not circumvent anti-adblock messages in the first-place, but - if you read the full text - they certainly are open to the possibility that circumventing could be an unfair hindrance of the publishers product, i.e. giving users an unauthorized access of the content.
Basic Information
Test link:
https://www.rbc.ru/
Category: anti-adblock Reported from: Russia Template version: 2User Environment
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:63.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/63.0 Extension: Nano Defender 15.0.0.64
Additional Message