Open skinkie opened 1 year ago
Objects with a trailing "" like **ServiceAccessRight** should probably be abstract A trailing "" also mean that they are not to be used as element ever But all abstract object don't have a "", we could have a convention to add it ... I don't think that this would break anything
Discussed: Replace he trailing "_" with "_Dummy" ... to be done at the end of the revision process by @skinkie
I would like to have a discussion on things that are either abstracts or subsitution groups currently suffixed with "_". This causes code generation to do funky things. Is there any way we could just rename them to something so it becomes clear they are not to be used as element ever? This is at least the case for ServiceAccessRight.
https://github.com/NeTEx-CEN/NeTEx/blob/master/xsd/netex_part_3/part3_fares/netex_fareProduct_version.xsd#L145
Suggestion to take a look at:
assignment_version_structure bounding_box_structure empty_type extensions extensions_structure group_of_entities_ref_structure line_shape_structure location_structure point point_on_link_ref_structure series_constraint_ref_structure service_access_right srs_name travel_specification