Open skinkie opened 5 years ago
Yes, as explained in Brussels on Nov 12th, there will be very soon an extension for new modes where we should be able to manage this.
Seems it was notsolved in new modes.
@Aurige How do we continue?
<xsd:simpleType name="ContinuousModeEnumeration">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation>Allowed values for continuous MODES of transport applicable to private and non-timetabled transport.</xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:NMTOKEN">
<xsd:enumeration value="walk"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="car"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="taxi"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="cycle"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="drt"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="movingWalkway"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="through"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="ski"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="skate"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:simpleType name="AllModesEnumeration">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation>Allowed values for r MODES: TPEG pti_table 01.</xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:NMTOKEN">
<xsd:enumeration value="all"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="unknown"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="air"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="bus"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="trolleyBus"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="tram"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="coach"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="rail"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="intercityRail"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="urbanRail"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="metro"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="water"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="cableway"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="funicular"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="lift"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="snowAndIce"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="taxi"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="selfDrive">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation>See pti12_x.</xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:enumeration>
<xsd:enumeration value="foot"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="bicycle"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="motorcycle"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="car"/>
<xsd:enumeration value="shuttle"/>
<!-- NOT IN tpeg -->
<!-- NOT IN tpeg -->
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
do we have a ContinuousModeEnumeration in NeTEx ?
It exists in the "next" branch, but it is absolutely nowhere used. What do we do? Delete it in next?
It has to be discussed, at minimum: I'm not happy with enum values like "drt" or "through" for example ... I would prefer to first finalise a discussion at Transmodel level, in order to sync SIRI and NeTEx afterword
Next may contain new stuff. but if we already know it should be removed, lets do so.
I think at it is nowhere referenced, that we remove it from the model for now and add it after the discussion, when synchronized. Or we only comment it out
In ContiniousModes we are using walk and cycle. In AllModesEnumeration we are using foot and bicycle. This should be made more consistent.