Closed ChrisSchinnerl closed 6 years ago
Wow, that was fast. Seems a little silly but if this changes the behavior to keep existing contracts active you should probably remove the warning I just put in with #3049.
We got lucky with the implementation here. If we had made a few different design choices earlier, this would have been more difficult to implement.
As it were, we do try to program such that changing things later is easy, but in this case I think we really did just get lucky.
Other than the user-facing message, this looks good, including the test.
Fixes #3013