Closed ChrisSchinnerl closed 6 years ago
@ChrisSchinnerl what from #3052 are you waiting on? My PR keeps failing because of TestRedundancyReporting
. This is a real chicken or the egg situation haha
looks good except for the check that needs to be added to synchronizationCheck
.
I like that it's +150 / -250
even though a lot of the +150 is even extending the siatest package. Means that the siatest package is a lot more powerful and doing a good job.
It seems like
TestRedundancyReporting
contains a NDF so I'd like to move it to the siatest package. This PR depends on the siatest package changes from PR#3052.EDIT: This also fixes a few bugs in the siatest framework I noticed while writing porting this test over.