Neketek / web-project-base

Web Project Base
2 stars 0 forks source link

Landing design #18

Open Neketek opened 6 years ago

Neketek commented 6 years ago

We need to find good examples of the landings to which Martha can refer while she is designing landing for us.

I'm waiting for you suggestions in comments.

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

Ole! Your sexy dd here. Mine take on our website design is to make it nerdish and corporate in the same time. I wanna avoid getting struck when browsing our website straight after freaking out in a terminal for like 10 hours in a row.

References

First of all some references:

Colours / Pallette

Current arachnid42 colours are what I do like. This green (#07F906) and black are gorgeous. Though I understand that design usually might take more then two colours and these two might be not the best choice for attracting clients (they might get blinded by this acid shit).

My take is to use a neat pallette by one random guy called base 16. There is a shitload of different variations of this pallette so we might end up with a good one for god's sake. You can test them out right in your terminal using this repo.

My pallette: image

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@ddnomad I agree, I personally like their landings too, but they are orient them on the developers, and in our situation we should try to attract quite opposite group of people, business mans. Lets see what others can propose. And maybe you have something which is oriented on the simple folks?

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@Dubbinary @jerichofs @vsmysle What you have in mind?

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

@Neketek not exactly. What is our TM? Originally we thought of startup kiddies who wanna their shit done from scratch. In such an occasion we want two things:

  1. Distract stupid clients that have no idea what they want to be done (see Robert)
  2. Attract those who are looking for a professional developers aka geeks. Tech skilled, nerdish, efficient and obsessed with code AF.

I think we can get a completely niche market with such an approach. We do not want to be a simple galley, do we?

vsmysle commented 6 years ago

@Neketek I will try to figure out what landing pages I like and report here soon.

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

UPDATE

I'm researching any possibilities to get some clients in EU (locally in Eesti or something). In such a way we wan't to orient on local companies. Give me a couple of minutes and I'll dig a lil bit deeper.

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

Eesti Galleys & Co

Do you want me to continue? The things is: if we gonna orient on existing galleys the result will be bad. Really bad.

We need to figure our our own approach. My suggestion: go nerdy, attract more engineering people. We will have less problems (clients will be not that tech noobs) and we will have our own TM that is quite different from other companies out there.

Also we might come up with our own product at some point. Then we want to go even nerdier.

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@ddnomad I agree, probably we should stick to nerdy design. This galleys landings look so fucking old that my grand grand pa can call them bayan.

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@ddnomad But they are definitely trying to be modern.

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

@Neketek they are trying to huyak-huyak-i-v-production mostly :dagger:

vsmysle commented 6 years ago

Hola! For refs I found landing pages that I like:

Personally, I agree with @ddnomad that we can stick to green&black main colours and add some pink(?) or purple(?) ones.

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@vsmysle This two are nice ones. https://prettier.io/ and https://hackjunction.com/ . For a long time already I'm seeing interesting tendention when background becomes monochromatic or gradient to make content more noticeable because of the contrast with the background and general design becomes very simplistic which is actually good but requires good design skill to compose into something pretty. About colors, I don't know, guys, there is nothing wrong to have dark colors at the landing, but it's up to designer. Of course we'll discuss and correct the design if needed. Tomorrow I'll discuss general style with Alexander, maybe we'll be able to create main frame of the landing: background, header and so on.

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@ddnomad They are still the clients who we want to attract, but usually having an idea and knowing how to implement it are completely different things. I'm almost 100% positive that startup kiddies are not a lot better than Robert, and there is a thing which makes them even a little worse than him, it is the fact that they think that they know how to do this and probably will try to give very useful "advices" about our part of work) So we'll suffer client related idiotic problems anyway. Of course there are also exceptions from this rule and I will be very glad to find one with a lot of money in the pockets.

P.S.

Didn't see your message in the flow.

Dubbinary commented 6 years ago

Hi, guys! We have already considered with design refs, but I've found some examples which exploded my brain:

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

One More - lukz kul

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

I need current iteration of landing design with a minimal verbose description of types of text/promo-stuff we need to place there.

Without it I doubt I'll come up with anything useful in terms of phrasing.

@Dubbinary @nepanime

nepanime commented 6 years ago
  1. Arachnid desktop var.1
  2. Arachnid desktop var.2

Above are two layout variants of the design drafts (with dummy text for now).

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

@nepanime that's nice actually. The only thing I would drastically reduce an amount of text content. Given I prepared meaningful description it would take too much reading for a client.

IMO we need more graphical content and fancy vector graphics for a landing. The full-fledged description of our services should go into a separate Services page (or alternatively Our approach page).

What do you think tho?

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@nepanime
I must admit it looks beautiful! I personally prefer this variant, it looks fancy, gradients make everything look fancy :) .

@ddnomad It will be better for @nepanime if you'll provide section names and their contents. Judging from her mock ups, her skill is good enough to accommodate your content without our barbaric attention and intrusion.

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

@neketek okay'i'then. Text content in bulk should be ready in 2-3 days depending on my work load.

@nepanime I'll let you know. Meanwhile I would suggest rework the logo. IMSO it looks clumsy.

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@ddnomad New logo or enhancement of existing?

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

@Neketek I have no sincerest idea. Multiple options and team-wide votes casting should help.

nepanime commented 6 years ago

@ddnomad okay, than I'll think about logo improvements and add more graphics on landing page.

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

@nepanime nice! And yep, as @Neketek said take our barbaric suggestions with a pinch of a salt. Anyway more options ensure all team members will be less dicks during negotiations :dancing_men:

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@ddnomad @nepanime I'm thinking about more "arachnid" logo style, but I'm afraid that a lot of people don't like spiders.

ddnomad commented 6 years ago

@Neketek we don't like people. People don't like arachnids. We do like arachnids. Fuck people.

https://www.reddit.com/r/spiderbro/

Neketek commented 6 years ago

@ddnomad Actually, that's a really good point! I lost my sympathy to most of people a long time ago!