Closed smilediver closed 2 years ago
This is great!
A few things I noticed trying it out:
- There needs to be ImNodesStyleVar enum entries for the new minimap style items
- I think the default minimap padding could be a bit larger, 8 seems like a nice value
Will add.
- It would be nice to have the old functionality as an option still
I'm not sure it's worth it. Mini-map's purpose is quick overview and navigation around a large graph, and IMHO, this behavior achieves it much better than the old one. I think it would be better to add zooming to the main editor view (I'm willing to look into it), which would make the old mini-map's behavior even more obsolete.
I've changed my mind, I can't see any use case where you'd want the old functionality
Oops, deleted the branch by accident. Sorry about that. 😊
The content-rectangle based minimap port is a nice touch. However, it can get quite elongated (at least in my contrived example shown here 😄 ). Do you think this is desired behavior? It could make the Minimap a bit difficult to see visually, if the user has very wide or tall node graphs.
Yeah, it looks weird, but long graphs will always look weird, it's an unsolvable problem. I could add a limit to the aspect ratio, so that the mini-map doesn't get so thin though, maybe that would improve the situation a bit.
As per Auburn's comment, let's not keep the old functionality 🙂
Change mini-map behavior to work as described in issue #117
Mini-map changes:
Color node editor example changes:
Internal changes:
NOTE: This is based on top of PR #120, so probably that one should go in first.