Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Did some more investigation. Although external to internal result in high
times. Pings from the device, are moderately normal.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=382 ttl=64 time=25.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=383 ttl=64 time=8.18 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=384 ttl=64 time=11.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=385 ttl=64 time=6.26 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=386 ttl=64 time=8.52 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=387 ttl=64 time=175 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=388 ttl=64 time=91.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=389 ttl=64 time=3.87 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=390 ttl=64 time=8.13 ms
I got my wifi to work again to reducing the txpower. But this doesn't affect
the external to internal ping time.
Original comment by ste...@konink.de
on 4 Sep 2011 at 9:28
This is mine. Wifi is work perfectly for me.
PING 192.168.10.7 (192.168.10.7) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=12.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=10.0 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=92.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=2.16 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=7 ttl=64 time=10.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=8 ttl=64 time=2.60 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=9 ttl=64 time=88.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=10 ttl=64 time=114 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=11 ttl=64 time=31.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=12 ttl=64 time=56.6 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=13 ttl=64 time=78.5 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=14 ttl=64 time=100 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=15 ttl=64 time=128 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=16 ttl=64 time=40.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=17 ttl=64 time=63.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=18 ttl=64 time=85.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=19 ttl=64 time=100 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.10.7: icmp_req=20 ttl=64 time=31.8 ms
Original comment by wkp...@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2011 at 9:29
Original comment by wkp...@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2011 at 10:17
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ste...@konink.de
on 4 Sep 2011 at 9:01