Closed JohnAAbbott closed 2 months ago
Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000%
with 2 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 84.93%. Comparing base (
ccf389e
) to head (90c6987
). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.:exclamation: Current head 90c6987 differs from pull request most recent head 7674a4d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7674a4d to get more accurate results
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/flint/fmpz.jl | 50.00% | 2 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I have not checked the numbers, but looks good, thanks! Also pretty future-proof in case we will have 128 bit systems :)
Should be added to the new "breaking" release.
Changed the errors to
OverflowError
similar to what Julia'sfactorial
does, but different from what Oscar/Nemo did up to now -- breaking change? I know it is not necessary to specify the function name in the error mesg (thoughInexactError
does precisely that); however I think it is more helpful to the user...