Closed fingolfin closed 3 months ago
Can you elaborate on the "redundant"? I have not found any other call to fmpq_mat_one
, so I am not sure where the redundancy comes from.
@thofma you are 100% right, this method (and two others using ccall
) should not be removed. I removed the first couple which are essentially equivalent to the default implementation, and then didn't pay attention. I guess I should stop making PRs at 01:00 :-(, at the very least those should be scrutinized doubly.
Oh, and of course if there are similar *_mat_one
methods for the other rings, e.g. fmpz_mat_one
, we could also switch the code to use those, I didn't check for that.
Thanks. About the other _one
methods, those can be added at some point I guess.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1782 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 85.95% 85.90% -0.06% ========================================== Files 95 95 Lines 36503 36491 -12 ========================================== - Hits 31375 31346 -29 - Misses 5128 5145 +17 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.