Closed literalplus closed 2 years ago
Hi! Thank you for the contribution!
Could you please try and update your branch using the current main branch? That should fix the CI Pipeline :)
Thanks for the hint! I rebased :)
Merging #348 (517425d) into main (c740220) will increase coverage by
0.11%
. The diff coverage is85.18%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #348 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.85% 76.96% +0.11%
==========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 2005 2032 +27
==========================================
+ Hits 1541 1564 +23
- Misses 320 322 +2
- Partials 144 146 +2
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
client.go | 75.32% <85.18%> (+0.14%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c740220...517425d. Read the comment docs.
Summary: A few endpoints were missing from the client.
Thanks for this useful library! During usage, I noticed that some of the endpoints from the Keycloak Admin API were missing, which I added to a temporary fork & now want to contribute to upstream :)
Namely, the ones where you can assign client roles to a client scope. Realm roles were already implemented, so addition & testing was rather straightforward. The application we're developing requires these endpoints, so I can also confirm that it works in practice. Nevertheless, I added tests for the endpoints to the existing suite.
Reference for API spec: https://www.keycloak.org/docs-api/15.0/rest-api/index.html#_scope_mappings_resource
Regarding the change in the unrelated test: It seems that Keycloak requires the client roles to be passed in the format "client name/role", whereas previously it was only passed as "role". This might be a recent improvement/non-improvement in validation: I noticed that the Keycloak image in docker-compose it set to the "latest" tag. The old version consistently failed on my machine and on GitHub Actions. I confirmed that this seems to be the intended way to do it using this utility method in the Keycloak source. I haven't in detail looked up which commit would have introduced such a change as it didn't seem necessary (but I can check it out if required).
Thank you!