Closed cctortecka closed 2 weeks ago
The protein header in your fasta file does not following any standard format. If you want to make it looks like UniProt, the format should be sp|XXX|XXX XXX
while yours have
>sp|neoAg_nuORF_p002_G7_nuORF_p002_nuORF__389
>sp|neoAg_nuORF_p002_G8_nuORF_p002_nuORF__277
>sp|neoAg_nuORF_p002_G9_nuORF_p002_nuORF__166
>sp|neoAg_nuORF_p002_G9_nuORF_p002_nuORF__955
Also, please upgrade the tools to the latest version. You are using very old versions. Some of the bugs might have been fixed.
Best,
Fengchao
Thanks Fengchao - by just repeating the identifier I was able to successfully generate the spectral library. Are there any common requirements for how the FASTA has to be generated for the different modules?
Claudia
The most ideal format is the UniProt, sp|XXX|XXX XXX
, but others such as NCBI, ENSEMBL, and generic ones should also work. Here (https://github.com/Nesvilab/philosopher/wiki/How-to-Prepare-a-Protein-Database) has a brief document about it.
FragPipe also tries to parse the gene and organism information from the protein header, but if there is no such info, the program won't crash (let me know if you see any error messages).
Best,
Fengchao
We can send you our reformatted version of the Broad database
Get Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef
From: Fengchao @.> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2024 2:02:11 PM To: Nesvilab/FragPipe @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: Re: [Nesvilab/FragPipe] Bad Fasta header broke FragPipe (Issue #1747)
External Email - Use Caution
The most ideal format is the UniProt, sp|XXX|XXX XXX, but others such as NCBI, ENSEMBL, and generic ones should also work. Here (https://github.com/Nesvilab/philosopher/wiki/How-to-Prepare-a-Protein-Database) has a brief document about it.
FragPipe also tries to parse the gene and organism information from the protein header, but if there is no such info, the program won't crash (let me know if you see any error messages).
Best,
Fengchao
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/Nesvilab/FragPipe/issues/1747#issuecomment-2307563064, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIIMM65IH26JX67YNXSGKYTZS52KHAVCNFSM6AAAAABNAOOQPCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMBXGU3DGMBWGQ. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues
Ok - that's very helpful thanks. @anesvi that would be great, then we can adapt our headers to your requirements.
Thanks, Claudia
Communicated by email.
Hi,
I'm having issues with converting Fragger results to a spectral library. I've successfully searched my data with the expected results, but at the last stage of library conversion I repeatedly encounter the attached error. I've tried a couple of different setups on our end, but unfortunately haven't been able to resolve this. We're running FragPipe on our Terra implementation (https://github.com/broadinstitute/PANOPLY/tree/dev/third-party-modules/panoply_fragpipe); if that helps.
Could you please have a look at this? Thanks, Claudia
log_2024-08-18_22-08-26.txt