I am reading with great interest your paper on "analysis of DIA proteomics data using MSFragger-DIA and FragPipe computational platform". There were many combinations of methods within the Fragpipe that we could use for DIA data. For example, I am very interested in applying the MSFragger-DIA method. I am wondering if Fragpipe provides step-by-step protocols for analyzing DIA data.
In that paper, methods like FP-MSF, FP-MSF hybrid, FP-DIAU, FP-DIAU hybrid, and DIA-NN library-free were used. I am confused as to how I can ensure the parameters that I choose are correct: (i) which workflow? (ii) should I use a decoy database? (iii) what to select under the Validation tab (iv) Do I need to configure the Advanced Output Options within MSFragger? etc etc.
Hi,
I am reading with great interest your paper on "analysis of DIA proteomics data using MSFragger-DIA and FragPipe computational platform". There were many combinations of methods within the Fragpipe that we could use for DIA data. For example, I am very interested in applying the MSFragger-DIA method. I am wondering if Fragpipe provides step-by-step protocols for analyzing DIA data.
In that paper, methods like FP-MSF, FP-MSF hybrid, FP-DIAU, FP-DIAU hybrid, and DIA-NN library-free were used. I am confused as to how I can ensure the parameters that I choose are correct: (i) which workflow? (ii) should I use a decoy database? (iii) what to select under the Validation tab (iv) Do I need to configure the Advanced Output Options within MSFragger? etc etc.
It would be great if you could enlighten me.
Best,
Teck