Open chambm opened 2 weeks ago
Two major reasons
spectrum_query
can only have one precursor_neutral_mass
and assumed_charge
, which is not suitable for DIAsearch_hit
Best,
Fengchao
True. Maybe multiple spectrum_query elements in that case? That is the way it's supposed to work for assumed_charge in the chimeric DDA case.
Yes, multiple spectrum_query
will work if the spectrum
, spectrumNativeID
, and start_scan
can be non-unique.
But then, how to specify the ranks of the same spectrum?
Best,
Fengchao
Yes, because of the assumed_charge thing they don't have to be unique. The ranks would be specific to a hypothetical precursor (theoretical mass and charge).
Sorry that my previous question is not clear. How to specify the rank 1, 2, 3 for the search_hit
of the same spectrum if list them in a separated spectrum_query
? Can the hit_rank
starts with > 1?
Thanks,
Fengchao
Each spectrum_query should start with hit_rank=1. Think of the rank as being for the hypothetical precursor ion rather than for the spectrum. Isn't that how it already works with the _rank1, _rank2 separate files?
Isn't that how it already works with the _rank1, _rank2 separate files?
In the _rank1, _rank2 files, we get the rank information by the file name. If we put all ranks in the same file and separate them in different spectrum_query
, is there a way to mark different ranks? Or I have to rank them by the hyperscore when loading the data?
Thanks,
Fengchao
Yes, I suppose if you need to aggregate everything back at the spectrum level, you'll have to regenerate the ranks by whatever score you want to use. For percolator I'd expect to use its q-value to do the reranking so potentially something that was rank 2 will become rank 1.
Thanks. Then, I need to make the changes and test if the downstream tools such as PeptideProphet and Philosopher support it.
Best,
Fengchao
Why does MSFragger in DIA mode write pepXML files with rank suffixes instead of using the hit_rank="N" attribute in a single pepXML? Is there an option to always write the DDA way?