NetAppDocs / active-iq-unified-manager

https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/active-iq-unified-manager/
2 stars 2 forks source link

The cluster load imbalance should include the duration requirement #10

Closed binder1234 closed 1 year ago

binder1234 commented 2 years ago

Page: Types of system-defined performance threshold policies

It does this by comparing the performance capacity used value for all nodes in the cluster to see if there is a load difference of 30% between any nodes. This is a warning event.

This statement should indicate that it has to exceed the 30% threshold for more than 24 hours.

netapp-manini commented 2 years ago

Thanks for writing in, I am looking into it.

binder1234 commented 2 years ago

Any updates?

netapp-manini commented 1 year ago

Hi, the reported issue will be fixed in the 9.11 and 9.10 docs retroactively as these documents have already been released. We are planning on a refresh and that will be available by this month. I will update this issue.

netapp-manini commented 1 year ago

Fixed at https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/active-iq-unified-manager/performance-checker/reference_types_of_system_defined_performance_threshold_policies.html#cluster-threshold-policies

Closing the issue.

binder1234 commented 1 year ago

Thanks.

From: Manini Mandal @.> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 8:15 AM To: NetAppDocs/active-iq-unified-manager @.> Cc: Binder, Robert @.>; Manual @.> Subject: Re: [NetAppDocs/active-iq-unified-manager] The cluster load imbalance should include the duration requirement (Issue #10)

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Closed #10https://github.com/NetAppDocs/active-iq-unified-manager/issues/10 as completed.

- Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/NetAppDocs/active-iq-unified-manager/issues/10#event-7011489442, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AZRLFUCXGYST2RLF5UKPOM3VUVDCVANCNFSM5YG43FXA. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.**@.>>